Arthur Walker-Jones, «The So-called Ostrich in the God Speeches of the Book of Job (Job 39,13-18)», Vol. 86 (2005) 494-510
The so-called ostrich passage (39,13-18) has been much discussed by scholars
both because of the difficulties it presents and the importance of its position in the
book of Job. Discussions have focused on why an ostrich appears, rather than
whether the Mynnr is, in fact, an ostrich. Quite a number of Hebrew words and
expressions have to be emended or explained to make them fit an ostrich.
Moreover, H.-P. Müller has shown that Mynnr is not the name for ostrich in Hebrew
or any Semitic languages, is not translated "ostrich" in early Greek versions, the
Peshitta, or Targums, and the translation "ostrich" probably came from a false
identification in early Christian reflection on nature. This article uses contemporary
ornithological literature and the information the passage provides on the
nest, habitat, behaviours, and calls of the Mynnr to identify a more likely type of
bird. The identification of the Mynnr as a sand grouse helps resolve a number of
problems in the text and clarify the literary connections of the passage to the rest
of the animal discourse, God speeches, and book of Job.
The So-called Ostrich in the God Speeches 501
that would appear to a poet to be rejoicing? For instance, the Hoopoe
Lark has a “striking black and white wing-pattern†and “prolonged
musical whistling and piping song may be uttered on the ground or
during display flight, when male spirals conspicuously upwards and
descends again on outstretched wings†(23). In this case, the wing, flight
pattern, and song all combine in conspicuous rejoicing. The pericope
would then move from breeding (v. 13) through the laying of eggs (v.
14) to the raising of chicks (v. 16). In sum, the evidence in the passage
indicates that the µynnr nests in the Middle East in an unlined scrape,
has a noteworthy and joyous call, and has behaviors that could be
described as its wing rejoicing.
Some birds have some of these characteristics. As mentioned, the
Hoopoe Lark could be said to have a joyous song and a wing that
rejoices, but the nests of larks are often lined (24). Stone curlews nest
directly on the ground. Their cries, however, can be described as “loud
and raucous†(25) or a “wild shrill wailing ‘coo-lee’†(26), which are
distinctive, but not particularly joyous.
Sand grouse, however, have all the characteristics. They nest in the
Middle East and lay their eggs directly on the sand in the desert. They
are fast, strong fliers, often traveling long distances in noisy flocks for
water. These flocks can perform “aerial evolutions†(27) so their wings
could be said to rejoice. Moreover, the calls of sand grouse are
both noteworthy and joyous. Meinertzhagen and Heinzel, Fitter,
and Parslow all describe some of their calls as “musical†and
“harmonious†(28). The Coroneted or Crowned Sand Grouse (Pterocles
coronatus), the Spotted Sand Grouse (Pterocles senegallus), the
Singed or Chestnut-Bellied Sand Grouse (Pterocles exestus), Pin-
tailed Sand Grouse (29) (Pterocles alchata) and the Black-bellied Sand
(23) H. HEINZEL – R. FITTER – J. PARSLOW, The Birds of Britain and Europe
with North Africa and the Middle East (London 31974) 198.
(24) U. PAZ, The Birds of Israel (New York 1987) 175-176.
(25) PAZ, Birds, 96.
(26) HEINZEL – FITTER – PARSLOW, Birds, 42; cf. C. R. MEINERTZHAGEN, Birds
of Arabia (Edinburgh 1954) 469.
(27) HEINZEL – FITTER – PARSLOW, Birds, 166.
(28) MEINERTZHAGEN, Birds of Arabia, 458, 459; HEINZEL – FITTER –
PARSLOW, Birds, 166, 168.
(29) MEINERTZHAGEN, Birds of Arabia, 459-461 refers to Pterocles alchata as
the Large Pin-tailed Sand Grouse and Pterocles exestus as the Small Pin-tailed
Sand Grouse. I have used the English names of HEINZEL – FITTER – PARSLOW,
Birds, 168.