Andrew M. Bowden, «The Fruit of Righteousness in James: A Study in Discourse Analysis.», Vol. 26 (2013) 87-108
In this study, a discourse analysis of James is conducted with the goal of better understanding the structure, theme, and cohesion of the letter. By paying careful attention to the details of the text, James’ paragraphs are identified, as are the signals of transition between the various paragraphs. The conclusions reached based on a discourse analysis of James are illuminating. Far from being a randomly arranged work, James repeatedly uses present prohibitory imperatives in the overall organization of the Epistle. These imperatives are important in marking transitions between main sections. Furthermore, a discourse analysis reveals that James is a coherent epistle comprised of 16 paragraphs, with 3,13-18 providing the overarching macrostructure of the letter. Bearing the fruit of righteousness, a theme prominent in 3,13-18, is seen to be the letter’s overarching and unifying thought.
100 Andrew M. Bowden
more vocabulary to the discourse than any other section of the Epistle44;
and (2) the tone of the Epistle immediately changes after this paragraph.
The brotherly tone will step into the background as James will call the
readers adulterers, double minded, sinners, and enemies of God (4,4.8)
and will blast them with ten imperatives in 4,7-10. Such an abrupt change
signals the letter’s “big idea” and explains the intense tone.
Finally, 3,13-18 is one of James’ clearest allusions to the prophetic
LXX. According to Jobes, James’ phrase “Who is wise (τίς σοφός) and
understanding (ἐπιστήμων) among you?” (3,13) echoes Hosea 14,10, a
passage in which God’s people are rebuked for covenant unfaithfulness
and which asks, “Who is wise (τίς σοφός) and will understand (συνίημι)
these things?”45. Additionally, James’ reference to the fruit of righteousness
(καρπὸς δικαιοσύνης) (3,18) appears in identical form in Amos 6,12.
These observations are significant for our study, implying that the center
of James alludes to the prophetic OT, and especially to the Twelve, who
“speak primarily a message that God’s people are covenant violators who
have become morally and spiritually as bad as the surrounding nations”46.
The significance of James’ references in 3,13-18, the heart of his Epistle,
cannot be understated, implying (1) that his message, like the Prophets’,
is a similar call to repentance, and (2) that prophetic language undergirds
James as a whole, since the letter’s center pulsates so clearly with the
heartbeat of the prophets.
This section’s third paragraph (4,1-10), like the previous, begins with
another interrogative, this time marked by πόθεν (4,1)47. It continues
through v. 10, where the third section of the body begins with a vocative
and prohibitory present imperative (μὴ καταλαλεῖτε ἀλλήλων, ἀδελφοί).
Some interpreters, grappling with James’ forceful tone in this paragraph
and the absence of the vocative “brother”, argue that a different audience
is addressed than the “brothers” of the previous sections. A better
solution, however, is that the brothers are now being directly chastised.
This is especially clear, since 4,1 begins in parallel fashion to 3,13 by
44
Varner, The Book of James: A New Perspective, A Linguistic Commentary Applying
Discourse Analysis (The Woodlands, TX 2010) 30.
45
Jobes, “Minor Prophets”, 138.
46
Ibid., 137.
47
Numerous lexical clues indicate that this paragraph (4,1-10) relates to the previous
(3,13-18). 3,18 instructed believers to sow righteousness by means of peace; 4,1 immediately
asks from whence come wars. In 4,2, the intended audience is full of the demonic wisdom
that was characterized in 3,14 by ζῆλον, and therefore are to resist the devil (4,7). Their
ζῆλον, rather than producing the righteous fruit of wisdom, has produced all the wicked
actions James said it would — they are murderers, adulterers, and acting like enemies of
God.