Bradley C. Gregory, «Slips of the Tongue in the Speech Ethics of Ben Sira», Vol. 93 (2012) 321-339
This article examines the references to slips of the tongue in the speech ethics of Ben Sira. Against the background of Proverbs, this characterization of accidental speech errors represents a new development. Its origin can be traced to the confluence between sapiential metaphors for mistakes in life and the idea of a slip of the tongue in the Hellenistic world. Ben Sira’s references to slips of the tongue are generally coordinated with a lack of discipline, though at least two verses seem to suggest that slips are not always sinful and that they represent a universal phenomenon, found even among the wisest sages.
		
			01_Biblica_1_F_Gregory_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:13 Pagina 337
                                                                                         337
                         SLIPS OF THE TONGUE IN THE SPEECH ETHICS OF BEN SIRA
                    The second line is explainable from the context in Proverbs,
                where the behavior described in 6,12-15 is followed by an assurance
                in 6,16-19 that God hates such things, but it is difficult not to see the
                comment in the first line (which is not reflected in Prov 6) as having
                arisen from personal experience 37. This suspicion seems to be con-
                firmed at the very end of the book when Ben Sira offers a prayer of
                thanksgiving to God. Near the beginning of the prayer he says:
                       You have delivered me from the slanderous tongue
                                and from lips of lying miscreants
                       from malicious lips, slimy deceivers
                                arrows sped by treacherous tongues (51,2d-3.5b-6a) 38
                    There is no love lost between Ben Sira and his opponents whom
                he pictures as having slandered him by twisting his words after hav-
                ing spoken sweetly to his face. Against this background of personal
                experience his advice in 28,24-26 makes perfect sense. A slight slip
                of the tongue, even if not being sinful in content, can have disas-
                trous consequences and therefore the utmost discipline is required
                for the sake of self-protection. Yet, while it is best not to give one’s
                enemies words that might be twisted around, Ben Sira appears con-
                vinced that in the event that one is slandered it will not be the last
                word. Eventually God will deliver the godly from the sinful speech
                of their enemies and will vindicate them before all.
                                                   *        *
                                                        *
                    Let us now draw together the salient points of our discussion. The
                first thing to observe is that all of Ben Sira’s references to a slip of the
                tongue reveal a concern for the serious social ramifications such slips
                can have. They are all of substantive nature rather than some of the
                errors we commonly label as slips of the tongue. He is not talking
                about malapropisms, phonetic confusions, or even humorous and ba-
                    37
                       Cf. “I hate three kinds of people, and I loathe their manner of life: a
                pauper who boasts, a rich person who lies, and an old fool who commits adul-
                tery†(Sir 25,2 NRSV).
                    38
                       This wonderfully colorful translation is from SKEHAN – DI LELLA, The
                Wisdom of Ben Sira, 560.