Terrance Callan, «Reading the Earliest Copies of 2 Peter», Vol. 93 (2012) 427-450
An examination of the three earliest extant copies of 2 Peter (namely those found in Papyrus 72, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus) is made in order to determine how the meaning of 2 Peter is affected by differences among the three copies, especially the textual variations among them. These textual variations produce significantly different understandings of Jesus in the three copies of 2 Peter, as well as other less prominent differences in meaning.
		
			06_Biblica_1_D_Callan_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:20 Pagina 443
                                                                                   443
                                 READING THE EARLIEST COPIES OF 2 PETER
                does not say that their speech originated in God as the likely orig-
                inal text does. 2) In 2,11 Sinaiticus has para kw (before the Lord)
                while the probable original text has para kuriou (from the Lord).
                The latter says that angels do not bring a slanderous judgment from
                the Lord, but Sinaiticus denies that angels bring a slanderous judg-
                ment before the Lord. This avoids any suggestion that God might
                be the source of a slanderous judgment. 3) In 2,13 Sinaiticus has
                komioumenoi (receiving) while the likely original text has adik-
                oumenoi (being wronged). Sinaiticus avoids all suggestion that the
                fate of the false teachers is unjust in any way.
                b) A clear and explicit text
                   A number of other features of 2 Peter in Codex Sinaiticus make
                the meaning of the likely original text clearer and/or more explicit.
                Thus in 1,4 Sinaiticus speaks of having escaped thn en tw kosmw
                epiqumian fqoraj (the desire for corruption in the world) rather
                than thj en tw kosmw en epiqumia fqoraj (the corruption in the
                world by desire) as in the likely original text. The latter is a more
                complex and ambiguous expression than the former. The former
                makes it clear that desire for corruption is what needs to be escaped.
                This is in harmony with 2,10 which speaks of desire for defilement.
                   In 1,5 Sinaiticus has kai auto de touto (and indeed this very
                thing) while the probable original text has kai auto touto de (and
                for this very reason = therefore). In Sinaiticus auto ... touto is
                probably to be understood as the object of pareisenegkantej
                (having brought in beside) and in apposition to spoudhn (eager-
                ness); in the probable original text auto touto is an adverbial ac-
                cusative introducing vv. 5-7 as the apodosis of the sentence in vv.
                3-7 29. In Sinaiticus vv. 5-7 can also be understood as the apodosis
                of the sentence, but one that has no introductory phrase. The ex-
                pression in Sinaiticus is probably easier to understand than that in
                the likely original text. The latter seems to be unique in Greek lit-
                erature, but the former is found in a few other places.
                   In 1,10 Sinaiticus has ina dia twn kalwn ergwn (in order that
                through good works) after spoudasate (be eager), something not
                found in the probable original text. This makes explicit that the ad-
                   29
                     On this see T. CALLAN, “The Syntax of 2 Peter 1:1-7â€, CBQ 67 (2005)
                632-640.