Travis B. Williams, «Reciprocity and Suffering in 1 Peter 2,19-20: Reading "caris" in Its Ancient Social Context.», Vol. 97 (2016) 421-439
Scholars have long debated whether "caris" in 1 Pet 2,19-20 should be understood as the unmerited favor which is divinely bestowed upon those who please God, or whether it represents a human action that secures a favorable response from God. What interpreters have continued to overlook, however, are the ancient social dynamics which underlie this passage. By interpreting "caris" within the framework of reciprocity and gift-exchange in the Greco-Roman world, this study brings fresh perspective to a problem which has long divided scholarship, and also suggests a new direction for understanding the letter's theology of suffering.
Reciprocity and Suffering in 1 Peter 2,19-20:
Reading ca,rij in Its Ancient Social Context*
The social dynamics of the ancient system of reciprocity have in-
formed New Testament interpretation for many decades. But, as with
many other trends in the field, its application to 1 Peter has materialized
somewhat slowly. While some have drawn on the Hellenistic conven-
tion of euergetism to illuminate the letter’s persistent admonition to
“do good” (1 Pet 2,14-15) and to perform “good works” (2,12) 1, mod-
ern insights on gift-exchange in the Greco-Roman world have exerted
little influence on the interpretation of 1 Peter. Overall, this general
neglect might not have the type of impact it would if we were con-
cerned with the social and economic relations represented in the
Gospels or the Pauline communities; nevertheless, there is one place
in 1 Peter where an informed cultural perspective could shed fresh light
on a text whose meaning has often eluded modern interpreters.
In the Haustafel of 1 Peter, the author begins his instructions on
appropriate conduct by addressing the “slaves” (oivke,tai) in the Anato-
lian congregations. After encouraging them to submit to their masters,
even those who may harshly mistreat them (2,18), he provides the mo-
tivational grounds for his admonition: “for this is ca,rij, namely, if, be-
cause of an awareness of God, one endures pain while suffering
unjustly” (2,19). He then continues by further elaborating on this point:
“For if you endure when suffering for sin, what glory (kle,oj) is there
in that? But if you endure when suffering for doing good, this is ca,rij
para. qew/|” (2,20). Commentators have long debated the meaning of
ca,rij in this passage. While some have suggested that the term refers
to the divine provision of unmerited favor upon those who please God
* I am very grateful to D.G. Horrell, J.M.G. Barclay, and M.B. Dinkler for read-
ing an earlier draft of this article and offering many valuable suggestions.
1
Many have understood these instructions as an encouragement to perform
beneficent acts on behalf of the wider civic community (see esp. B.W. WINTeR,
Seek the Welfare of the City. Christians as Benefactors and Citizens [First-Century
Christians in the Graeco-Roman World; Grand Rapids 1994] 12-40). The various
problems with this approach, along with an alternative way of understanding the
“good works” language of 1 Peter, can be found in T.B. WIllIAMs, Good Works
in 1 Peter. Negotiating social Conflict and Christian Identity in the Greco-Roman
World (WUNT 337; Tübingen 2014).
BiBlica 97.3 (2016) 421-439