Isabel Cranz, «Ritual Elements in Zechariah's Vision of the Woman in the Ephah», Vol. 96 (2015) 586-598
This paper proposes a conceptual link between Zechariah's vision of the woman in the ephah (Zech 5,5-11) and Assyro-Babylonian exorcisms utilizing figurines. My comparison focuses on the integration of ritual elements in Zech 5,5-11. This analysis highlights the modifications that the ritual elements underwent before they could function as an integral part of a prophetic vision. The analysis of Zech 5,5-11 against the backdrop of Assyro-Babylonian exorcisms sheds new light on the manner in which the prophetic author(s) employed ritual material in his exemplification of sin and atonement.
		06_An_Cranz_586-598_coopia_586-598 10/12/15 10:35 Pagina 593
               593      RITUAL ELEMENTS IN ZECHARIAH’S VISION OF THE WOMAN             593
               tion. The first text (CT 23.15-22+) includes an incantation to Šamaš, the
               second text (CT 23.15-22+) includes the zipadû formula (which is fol-
               lowed by an incantation to Šamaš), and the third text (BAM 323) instructs
               the supplicant to swear in the name of Šamaš. Similarly, the last text (W
               23287:91-98) specifies that the ritual is followed by an incantation ad-
               dressing either Šamaš or Marduk. In short, the pairing of ritual and in-
               cantations indicates that the participation of the gods played an important
               role for the ritual to be efficacious.
                            IV. The Conceptual links between Zech 5,5-11
                                  and Assyro-Babylonian Exorcisms
                   We can now proceed to compare Zech 5,5-11 with the rituals in
               question. When reading Zechariah‘s vision in conjunction with the As-
               syro-Babylonian rituals, the biblical text corresponds to the exorcisms on
               three levels. First, the woman in the ephah can be seen to parallel Assyro-
               Babylonian figurines in so far as an abstract or intangible principle takes
               on a corporeal shape. Modern commentators often take the prophet’s
               choice of a woman as an indicator of his misogynistic predisposition 32.
               Yet, given that Zechariah 5 is dominated by feminine vocabulary, it is
               more likely that Zechariah’s woman stands for an abstract principle sim-
               ilar to the personification of wisdom in the Book of Proverbs 33. It is,
               therefore, possible that both the figurines and Zechariah’s woman are di-
               rect representations of undesired and abstract qualities or entities. Second,
               the object representing the undesirable entity is placed in a vessel of
               everyday usage. The ephah in Zechariah’s vision is a vessel employed for
               transportation or storage, and as a liquid or dry measurement 34. A similar
                   32
                      DELKURT, Sacharjas Nachtgesichte, 271-272; KÖRTING, “Sach 5,5-11”,
               481-483. For the notion that the woman is a biblical femme fatale who per-
               sonifies all forms of female wickedness, see W. RUDOLPH, Haggai - Sacharja
               1–8 - Sacharja 9–14 - Maleachi (KAT 13,4; Gütersloh 1976) 120; D. PE-
               TERSEN, Haggai and Zechariah 1–8. A Commentary (Philadelphia, PA 1984)
               257-258. K. Elliger considers the woman as a symbol of temptation and sin-
               fulness in general as is presented in the form of Eve. K. ELLIGER, Das Buch
               der zwölf kleinen Propheten. Die Propheten Nahum, Habakuk, Zephania,
               Haggai, Sacharja, Maleachi (ATD 25.2; Göttingen 1951) 105.
                   33
                      H. GESE, Vom Sinai zum Zion. Beiträge zur biblischen Theologie (BevT
               64; München 1974) 213; DELKURT, Sacharjas Nachtgesichte, 269-270, and
               also KÖRTING, “Sach 5,5-11”, 484.
                   34
                      M. POWELL, “Weights and Measures”, Anchor Bible Dictionary 6
               (1992) 897-908, here 904.