Francis M. Macatanguay, «Mistos and Irony in the Book of Tobit»
The deuterocanonical Book of Tobit is a delightful story that employs ironic flourishes in its narrative. The word mistos which literally means 'wages' and figuratively connotes 'reward' appears frequently in the story. It is argued that the narrative use of the word participates in dramatic irony. As a rhetorical strategy, the irony addresses the limitations of the title character’s espousal of the traditional typology for reward and punishment.
06_Biblica_AM_MacAgantay_Layout 1 16/12/13 12:28 Pagina 581
                                                                                        581
                                  Μισθός AND IRONY IN THE BOOK OF TOBIT
               he does not know in particular that the travel companion who has led, ad-
               vised and guided Tobias is in fact Rafael 11, “one of the seven angels who
               stand ready and enter before the glory of the Lord†(12,15), it is no sur-
               prise that Tobit acts the way he does with the angel here in Tobit 12. The
               reader, on the other hand, endowed with the knowledge that Rafael is an
               angel sent by God, discerns the irony that Tobit unwittingly acts in a way
               that is inappropriate to the situation, since paying and giving the angel
               added compensation would be rather odd, even ridiculous. The long dis-
               cussion between father and son regarding the proper wage due to the angel
               (12,1-5) is as funny as it is moot and academic since an angel does not
               need any payment. As the angel would later say, even though Tobit and
               Tobias watched him eat and drink, he did not really do so (12,19). For all
               their talk of bonuses and wages, the father and the son have only the
               slightest clue as to what true μισθός is all about.
                   And so, Tobit and his son were about to pay the faithful man his wages
               for a job well done, but instead the divinely commissioned angel rewards
               them with a vision and a revelation (12,19.22). Instead of giving the angel
               his μισθός, Tobit and Tobias receive unexpectedly a reward. Unlike the
               first appearance of μισθός as a bonus that caused conflict between Tobit
               and Anna, the narrative indication of a reward this time around addresses
               the problems that beset the characters.
                   In the telling of this episode, the transition which occurs in Tob 12,5-
               6 can in truth be a bit jarring for its abruptness. And yet, the similarity in
               rhythm, the proximity, and the parallel construction of vv. 5 and 6a seem
               to link them as the sense of μισθός shifts. These verses connect the μισθός
               that Tobias offers the angel in v. 5 with the many “good things†(ἀγαθά)
               and marvelous deeds that God has done secretly for them in v. 6. There is
               thus a verbal interaction within these verses that allows for meanings to
               shift from the proffered to the implied.
                   To illustrate, Tobias calls and orders Rafael to take half of everything
               he has as his wages. One would expect a reply proper to the command.
               For a response, however, Rafael also calls the two men and orders them
               to acknowledge, thank and praise God for the many good things he has
               done for them. It is as if a battle of points of view with regard to μισθός
               is going on, one concerned literally with proper wages and the other with
               acknowledging the mysterious deeds of God for Tobit and his family. The
               extensive discussion of payment between Tobit and Tobias yields to
               Rafael’s long speech on God’s marvels. Rafael’s lengthy exhortation im-
                   11
                    See for instance I. NOWELL, “The ‘Work’ of Archangel Raphaelâ€, and
               B. EGO, “The Figure of the Angel Raphael According to His Farewell Address
               in Tob 12:6-20â€, Angels. The Concept of Celestial Beings – Origins, Devel-
               opment and Reception (eds. F.V. REITERER – T. NICKLAS – K. SCHÖPFLIN)
               (DCLY; Berlin 2007) 227-238; 239-254.