Simon J. Joseph, ««Seek His Kingdom»: Q 12,22b-31, God’s Providence, and Adamic Wisdom.», Vol. 92 (2011) 392-410
In Q 12,22b-31, a kingdom-saying functions as the climax to a sapiential collection, but it is not self-evident that this message is sapiential. Q 12,31 uses traditional wisdom structures and forms to advance what appears to be an «eschatological» message. In this study, I re-examine the nature of the wisdom in Q 12,22b-31 and argue that the theme of God’s providence can be understood in relation to eschatological ideals of the restoration of creation and a «Son of God»/Adamic christology.
		Biblica_1:Layout 1     21-11-2011   12:59   Pagina 405
                                                                             405
                                       “SEEK HIS KINGDOMâ€
            the role and function of Wisdom in the sapiential literature. Wisdom
            language was an appropriate way to identify and characterize Jesus
            as a teacher of revealed truths who mediated divine knowledge,
            wisdom, grace, and power. For example, Q 10,22 makes an exclu-
            sive claim that “no one knows the Son except the Father nor does
            anyone know the Father except the Son, and to whomever the Son
            chooses to reveal himâ€. This is language strikingly reminiscent,
            even parallel to that used to describe Wisdom — as “hidden from
            man but known to God†56. Q’s focus on Jesus as the “Son of Godâ€
            is absolute and exclusive. While some scholars have sought the ori-
            gin of this title in Hellenistic culture 57, or in Jesus’ use of ἀββά,
            early Jewish apocalyptic texts from Qumran contain several exam-
            ples of eschatological and royal figures being identified as “Son of
            Godâ€. For example, 4Q246 describes a figure as the “Son of Godâ€
            and the “Son of the Most Highâ€. In Wisdom literature, the wise man
            is a “son of God†(Wis 2,13.18; Sir 4,11). In Q, the “Son†has spe-
            cial knowledge of the “Fatherâ€. The focus in Q is on Jesus as “Sonâ€
            (υἱός) in relation to God as “Father†(πατήÏ/ἀββά).
                2. The Son of Man Traditions
                Jesus is not a “traditional messianic†figure in Q. Q never uses
            ΧÏιστός. Jesus is the “Son of Godâ€, the “son of manâ€, the “child of
            Wisdomâ€, the “Coming Oneâ€, and “Master/Lordâ€, but never ΧÏιστός.
            So while there is indeed a “Wisdom†component in Q and a nexus be-
            tween Q, Wisdom, and Christology, Q does not explicitly identify
            Jesus with Wisdom, but does explicitly identify him as the “Son of
            Godâ€. In fact, Jesus is exalted above all others, including John, who
            is himself greater than all those born “among women’s offspringâ€. Is
            Q’s exalted portrayal of Jesus as “Son of God†derived from his iden-
            tification as “son of man� This does not seem likely. The identifica-
            tion of Jesus as son of man is based on post-Easter reflection on the
            exaltation of Jesus. Since the “one like a son of man†in Daniel 7,13
            is a heavenly being and the “son of man†in the Parables is also a
            heavenly judge, it is reasonable to conclude that the expression was
            transferred to Jesus in Q. The identification of Jesus as the “son of
            man†created a distinctive new identity for Jesus as a heavenly judge
            representative of a rejected and persecuted group of the righteous.
               56
                    KLOPPENBORG, “Wisdom Christologyâ€, 144.
               57
                    SCHULZ, Spruchquelle, 223; LÜHRMANN, Redaktion, 66.