Bernard P. Robinson, «The Story of Jephthah and his Daughter: Then and Now», Vol. 85 (2004) 331-348
In Judges 11 Jephthah is an anti-hero, his rash vow and its implementation being for the Book of Judges symptoms of the defects of pre-monarchical Israel. The daughter is probably sacrificed; the alternative view, that she is consigned to perpetual virginity, has insufficient support in the text. The story speaks still to present-day readers, challenging them not to make ill-considered judgments that may have disastrous consequences; inviting them too to detect a divine purpose working through human beings in their failings as well as their strengths.
The Story of Jephthah and his Daughter: Then and Now 335
however, that hwhyl hyh is an unusual way to refer to a sacrifice. The
phrase is used of Levites being consecrated to the divine service (cf.
Num 3,12) and of Israel belonging to YHWH (as in Jer 24,7; Mal
3,17). Also, one would expect to find hlw[l, although the l is
admittedly missing from 2 Kgs 3,27, where Mesha offers up his
firstborn as a holocaust.
(ii) It is possible to take the vow as a promise to dedicate someone
to virginity under the image of a holocaust. In that case the language of
holocaust-offering is being meant metaphorically and hwhyl hyh directs
one to read it in terms of dedication to God. So D.Marcus and
P.T.Reis (15). According to Pamela Reis, what Jephthah intends is to
dedicate to YHWH one of his slaves but (in accordance with the laws
found in Lev 27) thereafter to redeem him for a sizeable sum of
money, which would be shared among the priests. Jephthah is thereby
seeking to bribe the people by his financial generosity. The redeemed
slave would, in accordance with the aforesaid laws, remain “holy†and
would never work again. Jephthah’s daughter is a “spoiled brat†(16), as
pampered by Jephthah as Adonijah was by David, who never asked the
latter why he had done anything (1 Kgs 1,6). In his other three
speeches Jephthah challenges his interlocutors to provide him with a
“Why?†(11,7.26; 12,3), but in addressing his daughter (11,35) he does
not do so. Knowing of her father’s vow, the daughter runs out of the
house to greet him, perhaps thinking that he will break his vow for her
sake, but perhaps also choosing the consequences of his not doing so,
namely that she would, after redemption, remain “holy†by not doing
women’s work, the birth and rearing of issue. “She would rather
continue to be the one and only love of an extremely indulgent father
than become some man’s first wife†(17). Ingenious as this reading it, it
fails to convince. Since when has a good knowledge of history or the
frequent use of religious language been a sufficient proof of virtue? If
redemption of a slave is meant, the terms of the vow are expressed
with intolerable obliqueness. Moreover, that a redeemed woman would
have to remain a virgin has to be argued by analogy with what
Talmudic tradition, rather than the biblical text, prescribes for a
redeemed animal.
(15) D. MARCUS, Jephthah and His Vow (Lubbock 1986) 25-26. P.T. REIS,
Reading the Lines. A Fresh Look at the Hebrew Bible (Peabody 2002) 105-130:
“Spoilt Child: A Fresh Look at Jephthah’s Daughterâ€.
(16) REIS, Reading the Lines, 120.
(17) REIS, Reading the Lines, 126.