HOME
BIBLICA
FILOLOGÍA NEOTESTAMENTARIA
  • HOME
  • BIBLICA
  • FILOLOGIA-NEOTESTAMENTARIA
Home > Search
Research has produced 2 results
Biblica - Vol 90 (2009) Cunha, Wilson de Angelo, A Brief Discussion of MT Isaiah 24,14-16 (2009)
Recent scholarship interprets Isaiah 24,14-16 in light of a “prophetic disputation pattern” genre, which sees the praise in vv. 14-15 as an assertion and the “I” statement in v. 16b as the counter-assertion, thus, correcting the assertion in vv. 14-15. This article seeks to challenge this interpretation and argue that the “I” statement in v. 16b does not need to function as a “counter-assertion” to the praise in vv. 14-15 but, rather, as introducing the proclamation of judgment for the unrighteous (v. 16c).
Biblica - Vol 97 (2016) Weingart, Kristin, Eine zweite Chance für Israel? Gericht und Hoffnung in Hos 3,1-5 (2016)
In Hosea 3 we find a reflection on the situation of the Northern-Israelites after the destruction of Samaria. The text, except for some slight additions, was originally composed shortly after 720 BCE by Northern Israelites and is part of an early composition of Hosea-materials. The fall of the Northern Kingdom is caused by the crimes denounced by Hosea and brought about by the divine judgment he had announced. The events therefore confirm Hosea’s prediction. Israel’s punishment is interpreted as an educational trial meant to make Israel return to YHWH. Hence, there is hope for restoration and a better future after the judgment.
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACTS
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • FOLLOW US
  • Copyright © 2025