- Instructions for Contributors
- Index by Authors
- Index by Biblical Books
- Font Instructions
- Vol 20 (2007)
- Vol 19 (2006)
- Vol 18 (2005)
- Vol 17 (2004)
- Vol 16 (2003)
- Vol 15 (2002)
- Vol 14 (2001)
- Vol 13 (2000)
- Vol 12 (1999)
- Vol 11 (1998)
- Vol 10 (1997)
- Vol 9 (1996)
- Vol 8 (1995)
- Vol 7 (1994)
Home
>
Filología Neotestamentaria
>
Vol 20 (2007)
>
Stanley E. Porter - Matthew Brook O'Donnel, «Conjunctions, Clines and Levels of Discourse.», Vol. 20 (2007) 3-14
Conjunctions have proved to be a recurring problem for Greek analysis. They are usually treated on the same level of analysis, as if they presented a single set of discrete choices. However, the use of conjunctions in Greek provides two horizontal clines of conjunctive meaning–continuity-discontinuity and logical-semantic significance–and are selected according to a vertical cline of discourse. This paper explores a basic framework for analysis of conjunctions in the light of these axes.
See more by the same author
«The Greek Verbal Network Viewed from a Probabilistic
Standpoint: An Exercise in Hallidayan Linguistics» 2001 3-41 
3
CONJUNCTIONS, CLINES
AND LEVELS OF DISCOURSE
STANLEY E. PORTER AND MATTHEW BROOK O’DONNELL
Conjunctions have proved to be a recurring problem for Greek analysis.
They are usually treated on the same level of analysis, as if they presented a
single set of discrete choices. However, the use of conjunctions in Greek pro-
vides two horizontal clines of conjunctive meaning–continuity-discontinuity
and logical-semantic significance–and are selected according to a vertical
cline of discourse. This paper explores a basic framework for analysis of
conjunctions in the light of these axes.
1. Introduction
Conjunctions are notoriously difficult in many languages, and Greek
perhaps more so than many, because it is a language that has been
blessed–or cursed, depending on one’s perspective–with a vast repertoire
of conjunctive words. The standard treatment of conjunctions in Greek
treats them in an undifferentiated way, as if theay functioned on the
same level. For example, in Porter’s Idioms of the Greek New Testament,
he defines conjunctions as: “a sub-class of particles used to join various
grammatical units, such as phrases, clauses, and so on”1. He then goes
on to provide a continuous list of (particles and) conjunctions, thirty
seven in all. It is noteworthy that Porter indicates that conjunctions join
various grammatical units. Another grammar, using a similar definition,
treats conjunctions as “linking words”. Although this grammarian indi-
cates that conjunctions can be differentiated semantically, structurally,
and lexically, he emphasizes their role in sentences by emphasizing their
coordinating and subordinating functions2. Even a more linguistically nu-
anced treatment fails to go much further than acknowledging a hierarchy
to intersentential conjunctions. This analysis differentiates their function
in terms of a cline or continuum of emphatic–de-emphatic, within which
S.E. Porter, Idioms of the Greek New Testament (Biblical Languages: Greek, 2; Shef-
1
field 21994) 204.
D.B. Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New
2
Testament (Grand Rapids 1996) 667 (definition: “word that connects words, clauses, sen-
tences, or paragraphs, and as a result links the component parts and/or the thought-units
of a language together”), 669.
FilologĂa Neotestamentaria - Vol. XX - 2007, pp. 3-14
Facultad de FilosofĂa y Letras - Universidad de CĂłrdoba (España)


RSS