117 NOTE SUR LA TRIPLE MENTION DES DISCIPLES EN JN 18,1-2 HELLEN MARDAGA This contribution deals with the threefold reference to the disciples in Jn 18:1-2 and pays special attention to the double mention of them in 18:1. In literary criticism there is discussion whether the second part of this repetition 18:1b (εἰσῆλθεν αὐτὸς καὶ οἱ μαθηταὶ αυτοῦ) is secondary. In the author’s view, however, 18:1b forms an integral part of the section 18:1-2 and cannot be seen as a later addition of a redactor. This threefold mention illustrates the creative style of the evangelist. Not only does it fit in with the rest of the pericope, but also coheres well with other passages of the Fourth Gospel. Récemment, avec son le livre In Dialogue with Another Gospel, M.A. Matson a attiré l’attention sur la relation spéciale entre l’évangile de Luc et celui de Jean1. L’auteur y accepte une influence de Jn sur Lc, particu- M.A. Matson, In Dialogue with Another Gospel? The Influence of the Fourth Gos- 1 pel on the Passion Narrative of the Gospel of Luke (Atlanta, GA 2001). Cet ouvrage ne revendique pas d’être le premier à traiter de la relation spéciale entre Jean et Luc. Dans le passé d’autres s’en sont occupés: F.C. Grant, “Was the Author of John Dependent Upon the Gospel of Luke?” JBL 56 (1937) 285-307; E. Osty, “Les points de contact entre le récit de la passion dans Saint Luc et Saint Jean”, RSR 39 (1951-52) 146-54; I. Busse, “St John and the Marcan Passion Narrative”, NTS 4 (1957-58) 215-9; Id., “St John and the Passion Narratives of St Matthew and St Luke”, NTS 7 (1960-61) 65-71; J. Schniewind, Die Paral- lelperikopen bei Lukas und Johannes (Hildesheim ²1958) 32-37; M.-É. Boismard, “Saint Luc et la rédaction du quatrième évangile”, RB 69 (1962) 185-211; P. Parker, “Luke and the Fourth Evangelist”, NTS 9 (1962-1963) 317-36; J.A. Bailey, The Traditions Common to the Gospels of Luke and John (Leiden 1963) 47-54; F. Hahn, “Der Prozess Jesu nach dem Johannesevangelium”, in Evangelish-Katholischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament. Vorarbeiten, Vol. 2 (Neukirchen-Vluyn 1970) 23-96; L. Cribbs, “A Reassessment of the Date and Origin and the Destination of the Gospel of John”, JBL 89 (1970) 38-55; Id., “St. Luke and the Johannine Tradition”, JBL 90 (1971) 422-50; Id., “A Study of the Contacts that Exist Between St. Luke and St. John”, SBL 1973 Seminar Papers (Chicago, IL 1973) 56- 8.92; Id., “The Agreements that Exist Between Luke and John”, SBL 1979 Seminar Papers (1979) 215-51; H. Klein, “Die lukanisch-johanneische Passionstradition”, ZNW 67 (1976) 155-86; R. Maddox, The Purpose of Luke-Acts (Edinburgh 1982) 158-79; M. Myllikoski, “The Material Common to Luke and John”, dans P. Luomanen, Luke-Acts: Scandinavian Perspectives (Helsinki 1991) 115-56; S. Landis, “Das Verhaltnis des Johannesevangeliums zu den Synoptikern: Am Beispiel von Mt 8,5-13; Lk 7,1-10; Joh 4,46-54”, BZNT 74 (1994) 1-73; B. Shellard, “The Relationship of Luke and John: A Fresh Look at an Old Problem”, JTS 46 (1995) 71-98; Id., Luke as the Fourth Gospel: Its Purpose, Sources and Literary Context (Sheffield 1997) 200-60. Filología Neotestamentaria - Vol. XVI - 2003, pp. 117-131 Facultad de Filosofía y Letras - Universidad de Córdoba (España)