- Instructions for Contributors
- Index by Authors
- Index by Biblical Books
- Font Instructions
- Vol 20 (2007)
- Vol 19 (2006)
- Vol 18 (2005)
- Vol 17 (2004)
- Vol 16 (2003)
- Vol 15 (2002)
- Vol 14 (2001)
- Vol 13 (2000)
- Vol 12 (1999)
- Vol 11 (1998)
- Vol 10 (1997)
- Vol 9 (1996)
- Vol 8 (1995)
- Vol 7 (1994)
Home
>
Filología Neotestamentaria
>
Vol 16 (2003)
>
Paul Danove, «le&gw Melding In The Septuagint And New Testament», Vol. 16 (2003) 19-31
This study investigates the grammatical phenomenon, le&gw melding, which arises in particular contexts in which two or three verbs of communication, one of which usually is le&gw, govern the same object complement. The study establishes the syntactic, semantic, and lexical requirements of the verbs of communication that participate in le&gw melding, develops the distinctive characteristics of this phenomenon, and considers its implications for translation and the formulation of lexicon entries for the Greek words of the Septuagint and New Testament.
See more by the same author
«Distinguishing Goal and Locative Complements of New Testament Verbs of Transference.» 2007 51-66 
«The Rhetoric of the Characterization of Jesus as the Son of Man and Christ in Mark» 2003 16-34
«Verbs of Transference and Their Derivatives of Motion and State in the New Testament: a Study of Focus and Perspective.» 2006 53-71
«A Comparison Of The Usage Of Akouw And Akouw- Compounds
In The Septuagint And New Testament» 2001 65-86
«The Rhetoric of the Characterization of Jesus as the Son of Man and Christ in Mark» 2003 16-34
«Verbs of Transference and Their Derivatives of Motion and State in the New Testament: a Study of Focus and Perspective.» 2006 53-71
«A Comparison Of The Usage Of Akouw And Akouw- Compounds
In The Septuagint And New Testament» 2001 65-86
25
Λέγω Melding in the Septuagint and New Testament
both verbs have the same lexical realization of their second complements:
either the initial verb of communication (2), the following verb of com-
munication (3), or neither verb (3) but never both verbs have their second
complement lexically realized.10 The restriction even holds in the three
occurrences of three linked verbs that permit the same lexical realization
of their second complement: only the first (1) or second (2) but never two
verbs have their second complement lexically realized.11 Thus, in these
514 occurrences, two or three linked verbs that permit the same lexical
realization of their second complement never appear with more than
one of these complements lexically realized; and both or all three verbs
govern the same concluding third complement. This indicates that their
syntactic, semantic, and lexical requirements not merely are linked as in
coordination but are melded in such a manner that both or all three verbs
lexically realize only one first, second, and third complement as if they
constituted a single verb.
The same restriction, however, does not extend to the second comple-
ment when the linked verbs do not permit the same lexical realization
of their second complements. This appears with 77 occurrences of λέγω
melding in which the initial verb, unlike λέγω, permits the lexical reali-
zation of its second complement only as an accusative case noun phrase
(N+acc), a genitive case noun phrase (N+gen), or an ἐν prepositional
phrase (P/ἐν); and the final verb, like λέγω, permits its lexical realization
only as a dative case noun phrase (N+dat) or a πρός prepositional phrase
(P/πρός). In the 76 occurrences of two such linked verbs, either the initial
verb (70 occurrences) or second verb (2 occurrences) or neither verb (2
occurrences) or both verbs (2 occurrences) may appear with their second
complement lexically realized.12 The one occurrence of λέγω melding
Second complement of the initial verb lexically realized and second complement
10
of the second verb null (2 occurrences in NT): ἀποκρίνομαι + φημί (N+dat: Luke 23:3)
and ἀπαγγέλλω + ὀμνύω (N+dat: Heb 6:13). Second complement of the initial verb null
and second complement of the second verb lexically realized (3 occurrences in LXX):
ἀποκρίνομαι + ἀπαγγέλλω (N+dat: Jdth 6:17); ἀπαγγέλλω + [a second] ἀπαγγέλλω (1 Sam
10:16a; 22:22). Second complement of the initial verb lexically realized and second comple-
ment of the second verb null (3 occurrences = 2 in LXX and 1 in NT): ἀποκρίνομαι + φημί
(Matt 8:8); ἀποκρίνομαι + προσλέγω (2 Macc 7:8); ἀπαγγέλλω + [a second] ἀπαγγέλλω
(Judg 14:12).
Second complement of the initial verb lexically realized and second complement of
11
the second and third verb null (1 occurrence in LXX): ἀποκρίνομαι + λέγω + λέγω (P/πρός:
Gen 23:10). Second complement of the initial and third verb null and second complement
of the second verb lexically realized (2 occurrences in NT): ἀποκρίνομαι + λέγω + λέγω
(N+dat: Matt 22:1); ἀποκρίνομαι + λέγω + λέγω (P/πρός: Luke 14:3).
Second complement of verb of communication lexically realized and second comple-
12
ment of λέγω null (70 occurrences = 38 in LXX and 32 in NT): δέομαι (N+gen: Deut 3:23;
1 Kgs 8:47; 2 Chr 6:37; Luke 5:12); ἐπερωτάω (N+acc: Gen 24:23; 43:7; 2 Kgs 19:10 [A]; Jer


RSS