- Instructions for Contributors
- Subscribe to Biblica or Send books for review
- Index by Authors
- Index by Biblical Books
- FAQ
- Font Instructions
- Vol 94 (2013)
- Vol 93 (2012)
- Vol 92 (2011)
- Vol 91 (2010)
- Vol 90 (2009)
- Vol 89 (2008)
- Vol 88 (2007)
- Vol 87 (2006)
- Vol 86 (2005)
- Vol 85 (2004)
- Vol 84 (2003)
- Vol 83 (2002)
- Vol 82 (2001)
- Vol 81 (2000)
- Vol 80 (1999)
- Vol 79 (1998)
Home
>
Biblica
>
Vol 86 (2005)
>
Thomas R. Hatina, «Who Will See "The Kingdom of God Coming with Power" in Mark 9,1 Protagonists or Antagonists?», Vol. 86 (2005) 20-34
In conventional readings of Mark 9,1, the meaning of the "kingdom of God coming with power" determines the identity of the bystanders who will supposedly experience ("see") it. Since the prediction of the kingdom is usually regarded as a blessing, it is assumed that the bystanders are protagonists. In contrast to this conventional approach, the reading proposed in this essay begins with the group(s) which will experience ("see") "the kingdom of God coming with power", first in 9,1 and then in 13,26 and 14,62. When prior attention is given to these groups in the context of the narrative, Jesus prediction in Mark 9,1 emerges not as a blessing promised to the protagonists, but as a threat of judgment aimed at antagonists.
Who Will See âThe Kingdom of God Coming with Powerâ 21
is to offer such a reading by drawing prior attention to the group(s)
which will experience (âseeâ) âthe kingdom of God coming with
powerâ, first in 9,1 and then in 13,26 and 14,62. When the apocalyptic
language in Mark 9,1 â which can certainly in and of itself convey
both judgment and vindication â is subjected to this perspective in
reading, the bystanders emerge as antagonists, with which the
audience would not have identified, and the prediction of âthe
kingdom coming with powerâ emerges as a threat of divine judgment.
In support of this reading it is argued that (1) the bystanders in 9,1 are
in a synonymous relationship with those who are threatened by Jesus
in 8,38, (2) the only other similar apocalyptic events of the
manifestation of divine power (duvnami") in 13,26 and 14,62 are
likewise expected to be âseenâ by the storyâs antagonists, and (3)
similar apocalyptic events in early Judaism were expected to be âseenâ
by antagonists.
1. The Ashamed and the Bystanders: A Synonymous Parallelism
Between Mark 8,38 and 9,1
One of the questions which necessarily arises in any narrative
reading of Mark 9,1 concerns its relationship to the immediate context.
Should Mark 9,1 be read as the conclusion of a pericope or as the
beginning of the Transfiguration account (3)? In addressing this
question, redaction critics have rightly focused much of their attention
on the editorial formula kai; e[legen aujtoi'". While 9,1 may have at one
time been an isolated unit, I follow the lead of those critics who argue
that the formula is more closely connected to 8,38 than to 9,2 on the
basis that kai; e[legen aujtoi'" is used elsewhere in Mark to conclude and
to preserve the salient point of a larger discourse (4). In addition, J.D.
Crossan has convincingly argued that 8,34-9,1 must be regarded as a
(3) Very few argue that 9,1 stands alone as a sole vignette in the final
redaction. E.g. L. OBERLINNER, âDie Stellung der âTerminworteâ in der
eschatologischen VerkĂŒndigung des Neuen Testamentsâ, Gegenwart und
kommendes Reich. Festschrift S. Anton Vögtle (ed. P. FIEDLER â D. ZELLER)
(SBB; Stuttgart 1975) 63.
(4) Of the eleven other occurrences, kai; e[legen aujtoi'" functions as a link
which connects the preceding material. See 2,27a; 4,2b.11.21.24; 6,4.10; 7,9;
8,21; 9,31; 11,17. See, for example, E. TROCMĂ, âMarc 9,1: prĂ©diction ou
rĂ©primande?â SE 2 (1964) 260-264. This connection is also found in modern
Greek New Testament editions (e.g. WESTCOTT â HORT, UBSGNT 1-4, NESTLE-
ALAND 26th and 27th).


RSS